[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080629070833.GA4898@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 09:08:33 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix init_memory_mapping over boundary v4
* Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> some end boundary is only page alignment, instead of 2M alignment,
> so call ker_phycial_mapping_init three times.
> then don't overmap above the max_low_pfn
>
> v2: make init_memory_mapping more solid: start could be any value other than 0
> v3: fix NON PAE by handling left over in kernel_physical_mapping
> v4: revert back to v2, and use PMD_SHIFT to calculate boundary
> also adjust size for pre-allocated table size
i've got v3 applied to tip/master and it worked well in testing - on the
old, 512m RAM problem laptop too. So could you send v4 as a delta patch
instead please, against tip/master?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists