lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4867733A.3060203@fastmq.com>
Date:	Sun, 29 Jun 2008 13:34:18 +0200
From:	Martin Sustrik <sustrik@...tmq.com>
To:	David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>
CC:	Martin Lucina <mato@...elna.sk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Higher than expected disk write(2) latency

David Newall wrote:
> Martin Lucina wrote:
>> Measurement of the write(2) time is performed using the TSC, so any
>> latency there is negligible.
> 
> Measuring each write is lavish and bound to impact the results.  To
> measure sustained throughput, get the time only at start and end, and
> divide the difference by the number of writes.

Hi,

We're using RDTSC to measure time, which takes ~30 nanoseconds to 
complete. I would say this is negligible given that latency of a write 
is 5 orders of magnitude higher.

Martin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ