[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080630090744.GB6598@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:07:44 +0200
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] CFS vs cpu hotplug
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 12:16:56AM +0200, Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> it seems to be related to migrate_dead_tasks().
>
> Firstly I added traces to see all tasks being migrated with
> migrate_live_tasks() and migrate_dead_tasks(). On my setup the problem
> pops up (the one with "se == NULL" in the loop of
> pick_next_task_fair()) shortly after the traces indicate that some has
> been migrated with migrate_dead_tasks()). btw., I can reproduce it
> much faster now with just a plain cpu down/up loop.
>
> [disclaimer] Well, unless I'm really missing something important in
> this late hour [/desclaimer] pick_next_task() is not something
> appropriate for migrate_dead_tasks() :-)
>
> the following change seems to eliminate the problem on my setup
> (although, I kept it running only for a few minutes to get a few
> messages indicating migrate_dead_tasks() does move tasks and the
> system is still ok)
>
> [ quick hack ]
>
> @@ -5887,6 +5907,7 @@ static void migrate_dead_tasks(unsigned int dead_cpu)
> next = pick_next_task(rq, rq->curr);
> if (!next)
> break;
> + next->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, next);
> migrate_dead(dead_cpu, next);
>
> }
Thanks Dmitry! With your patch I cannot reproduce the bug anymore.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists