[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080630164324.GA1536@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:43:24 +0300
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
Cc: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@...asas.com>,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix extern inline errors with gcc 4.3.0
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:22:01PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 10:32:43AM +0300, Benny Halevy wrote:
> > Note that the crash happened with gcc 4.1.2 and it will get the
> > -fno-unit-at-a-time flag with the proposed patch.
> >
> > That said, this option or the lack of it ought not to cause any
> > runtime crashes. If it does, I'd feel much more comfortable to know
> > exactly what the root cause is before deciding to use the flag to
> > workaround^hide it.
>
> I agree.
>
> The constraints on [no-]unit-at-a-time that I see are:
>...
> x86_64 uses unit-at-a-time always
>...
The only gcc versions that ever supported unit-at-a-time without
enabling it by default was some patched gcc 3.3 that included a
backport of unit-at-a-time to gcc 3.3.
Just as a note that I doubt this matters in practice today.
> Jeff
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists