[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5dlk0mdbqd.fsf@Hurtta06k.keh.iki.fi>
Date: 30 Jun 2008 21:22:18 +0300
From: Kari Hurtta <hurtta+gmane@...lo.fmi.fi>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Fix copy_user on x86_64
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
> On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Vitaly Mayatskikh wrote:
> >
> > "For this reason, all patches should be submitting e-mail "inline".
> > WARNING: Be wary of your editor's word-wrap corrupting your patch,
> > if you choose to cut-n-paste your patch."
> >
> > My first thought was "should be attached inline".
>
> Yeah, no, the "inline" there means literally as no attachment at all, but
> inline in the normal mail.
And not as own mime body part with
Content-Disposition: inline
?
( As you see "inline" have several meanings.
yes. Some mail readers treats only first body part as 'inline'
and other have 'attachments'.
)
/ Kari Hurtta
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists