[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0806302020260.27080@blonde.site>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:23:54 +0100 (BST)
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@...com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] splitlru: BDI_CAP_SWAP_BACKED
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>
> Hmm, how about adding LRU only for shmem/tmpfs ? nonsense ? ;)
I'd much prefer not: the more LRUs, the more balancing problems;
And I don't think shmem/tmpfs _deserves_ its own LRUs.
But it cannot be ruled out.
Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists