[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080630223119.GB58260@atlantis.8hz.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:31:19 +0000
From: Sean Young <sean@...s.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regression: boot failure on AMD Elan TS-5500
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 03:04:33PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> >It's a bit odd that the boot loader neglected to set up ds properly, but
> >changing the testb line to
> >
> > testb $(1<<6), %cs:BP_loadflags(%esi)
> >
> >should work. (Or perhaps a %ss: override would be better?)
> >
> >I'm assuming that the GDT setup isn't completely mad and that the
> >segments have the same base at least.
> >
>
> This should have been set up by the *boot code* (specifically lines
> 57-61 of arch/x86/boot/pmjump.S) since he's using a conventional boot
> loader (syslinux) so something is utterly fuggled up. Using %cs: here
> should be safe, though (and *is* more conservative, after all, why
> otherwise bother reloading these segments at all?), but it still
> concerns me a great deal if this is broken in this way. It's definitely
> better than %ss:.
>
> In particular, I'm wondering if the Elan CPU has any strange ordering
> requirements with regards to the protected mode transition that we're
> not obeying.
>
> It would be interesting to put in a heavyweight "brutally synchronizing"
> instruction like WBINVD at various places in arch/x86/boot/pmjump.S and
> see if it helps.
You are right. With wbinvd before %ds is changed in that file the kernel
boots.
Sean
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists