linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -tip/master] x86: nmi_watchdog

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080630065056.GB9561@elte.hu>
Date:	Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:50:56 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>,
	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip/master] x86: nmi_watchdog - documentation fix


* Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote:

> [Alan Cox - Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 08:32:04PM +0100]
> | > > The following sounds better to me: "In kernels prior to 2.4.2-ac18 the 
> | > > NMI-oopser is enabled..."  In this context the phrase itself is in the 
> | > > present, but we point to past kernels.
> | 
> | Agreed.
> | 
> | > And the winner is? I'm not native English speaker so I can't select
> | > a better candidate in {is,was} limited set.
> | 
> | The suggestion above.
> | 
> | Alan
> | 
> 
> Thanks Alan, I've already sent the updated version. Hope you will find 
> it in your mbox /I thought I've Cc'ed you/ ;)

applied to tip/x86/nmi-watchdog - thanks everyone.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/