[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9156032.1214874373850.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 10:06:13 +0900 (JST)
From: kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com
To: kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@...com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [RFC][PATCH] memcg: change shmem handler.
----- Original Message -----
Sorry..a bit more words.
>>Is that a good thing? If we really decide that globally we
>>need such a counter, then fine for memcg to follow; but I've
>>not yet heard it asked for.
>After swap-controller is introduced, I can imagine there will be a
>swap-full/swap-less cgroup. And shmem will be able to be swapped out.
not
>memcg handles limit of memory usage and Admin/Middleware will want to
>know current limit is good or bad. So, showing amount of tmpfs
>will be good (It's now shown as Cache...a pages easily kicked out ;)
>
I'm not sure but how this seems under memcg in which DataBase runs.
Now.
- anon
- cache (including DataBase's shmem)
After
- anon
- cache (file cache)
- shmem (DataBase's working area)
not good ?
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists