[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080701111918.GA11809@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 13:19:18 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
florian.fainelli@...ecomint.eu,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] x86: Add user configurable GPIO-lib support
* Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de> wrote:
> > ... and thus perhaps your GPIO_USERSELECTION patch should move into
> > drivers/ and be generally accessible, not special to x86?
>
> Yes I'd really like to move it there, too. But currently that clashes
> with architectures like MIPS, some PPC flavours and probably others
> that implement their own GPIO API. We should have an
> ARCH_IMPLEMENT_GPIO or whatever, but currently we don't seem to have
> that.
>
> So well. If it's desired to put the user selection into drivers/gpio
> (which I'd really prefer), I can try to make a patch that adds
> ARCH_IMPLEMENT_GPIO to every arch that implements their own GPIO API
> and make GPIO_USERSELECTION depend on !ARCH_IMPLEMENT_GPIO.
or we could try it the other way around: stick
ARCH_ALLOWS_TRULY_GENERAL_PURPOSE_INPUT_OUTPUT (note: please use a
better name ;-) into x86, add the user text to drivers/ and let other
architectures enable it too?
That way your commits would still be pretty focused (you'd avoid having
to touch a lot of architectures) and it would still work all across the
spectrum.
hm?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists