[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080701134343.GA1865@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 17:43:43 +0400
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Subject: [PATCH] serial: 8250: fix shared interrupts issues with SMP and RT
kernels
With SMP kernels _irqsave spinlock disables only local interrupts, while
the shared serial interrupt could be assigned to the CPU that is not
currently starting up the serial port.
This might cause issues because serial8250_startup() routine issues
IRQ-triggering operations before registering the port in the IRQ chain
(though, this is fine to do and done explicitly because we don't want to
process any interrupts on the port startup).
With RT kernels and preemptable hardirqs, _irqsave spinlock does not
disable local hardirqs, and the bug could be reproduced much easily:
$ cat /dev/ttyS0 &
$ cat /dev/ttyS1
irq 42: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
Call Trace:
[C0475EB0] [C0008A98] show_stack+0x4c/0x1ac (unreliable)
[C0475EF0] [C004BBD4] __report_bad_irq+0x34/0xb8
[C0475F10] [C004BD38] note_interrupt+0xe0/0x308
[C0475F50] [C004B09C] thread_simple_irq+0xdc/0x104
[C0475F70] [C004B3FC] do_irqd+0x338/0x3c8
[C0475FC0] [C00398E0] kthread+0xf8/0x100
[C0475FF0] [C0011FE0] original_kernel_thread+0x44/0x60
handlers:
[<c02112c4>] (serial8250_interrupt+0x0/0x138)
Disabling IRQ #42
After this, all serial ports on the given IRQ are non-functional.
To fix the issue we should explicitly disable shared IRQ before
issuing any IRQ-triggering operations.
I also changed spin_lock_irqsave to the ordinary spin_lock, since it
seems to be safe: chain does not contain new port (yet), thus nobody
will interfere us from the ISRs.
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
---
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 02:12:21AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com> wrote:
>
> > 8250's initialization routines relies on the fact that _irqsave
> > spinlock will disable local hardirqs, so that the driver can issue
> > IRQ-triggering operations before registering the port in the IRQ
> > chain.
> >
> > With RT kernels and preemptable hardirqs this isn't true, _irqsave
> > spinlock does not disable local hardirqs, and this causes following
> > trace:
>
> again, please let the -rt maintainers sort out which patches need to be
> propagated to upstream maintainers.
This appears to be not only RT issue though. In theory, this can be
triggered on SMP also. Thanks to Daniel Walker for pointing this out.
drivers/serial/8250.c | 8 ++++++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/serial/8250.c b/drivers/serial/8250.c
index 76ccef7..702e0d3 100644
--- a/drivers/serial/8250.c
+++ b/drivers/serial/8250.c
@@ -1831,7 +1831,9 @@ static int serial8250_startup(struct uart_port *port)
* the interrupt is enabled. Delays are necessary to
* allow register changes to become visible.
*/
- spin_lock_irqsave(&up->port.lock, flags);
+ spin_lock(&up->port.lock);
+ if (up->port.flags & UPF_SHARE_IRQ)
+ disable_irq(up->port.irq);
wait_for_xmitr(up, UART_LSR_THRE);
serial_out_sync(up, UART_IER, UART_IER_THRI);
@@ -1843,7 +1845,9 @@ static int serial8250_startup(struct uart_port *port)
iir = serial_in(up, UART_IIR);
serial_out(up, UART_IER, 0);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&up->port.lock, flags);
+ if (up->port.flags & UPF_SHARE_IRQ)
+ enable_irq(up->port.irq);
+ spin_unlock(&up->port.lock);
/*
* If the interrupt is not reasserted, setup a timer to
--
1.5.5.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists