[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080701143418.GA30693@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 07:34:18 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
TAKADA Yoshihito <takada@....nifty.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH] x86 ptrace: fix PTRACE_GETFPXREGS error
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 12:11:04PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > > since the original fix is already upstream, i've applied the delta
> > > patch below. Should we still do this for v2.6.26 or can we defer it
> > > to v2.6.27? As ptrace is the only user of this facility for now this
> > > would be an identity transformation AFAICS and the v2.6.26 release
> > > is very close.
> >
> > I don't think there's a problem with 2.6.26 either way. I agree that
> > the user_regset internal API does not matter much before 2.6.27.
>
> okay - i've queued it up in tip/x86/ptrace for now.
>
> > My patch alone applies to 2.6.25, which is why I CC'd it to stable. I
> > think applying that (and not takada's patch) to stable-2.6.25 would be
> > best.
>
> i think Greg already queued the original fix up for v2.6.25, as per the
> commit notifier below.
Yes I did queue that one up, but it looks different from Roland's
original patch in this thread.
Roland, does the patch below suffice? Or should I take your original
one instead, or as well?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists