linux-kernel - Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] linux-next: Tree for June 30

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080701021046.GA30401@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:10:46 -0400
From:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] linux-next: Tree for June 30

On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 02:46:49PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Here is a patch to replace the hard-coded limit with dynamic allocation.  
>  I have only build-tested it, but it seems to work.
>
> Please try it out; barring any screams to the contrary I'll add it to -tip.
>
> 	-hpa

I think there was no specific reason for limit 100. Just that probably at
that point Eric thought 100 is sufficient. Dynamic allocation is much
better.

This patch looks good. Thanks.

Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/