[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87fxqt4p19.fsf@skyscraper.fehenstaub.lan>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 17:12:02 +0200
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...urebad.de>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc: Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer <mchouque@...e.fr>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Longstanding bug in ac97/intel8x0 resume/init
Hi,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> writes:
> At Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:37:42 +0200,
> Johannes Weiner wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> writes:
>>
>> > At 30 Jun 2008 20:58:03 +0200,
>> > Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hey there,
>> >>
>> >> hannes@...urebad.de (Johannes Weiner) writes:
>> >> > Johannes Weiner <hannes@...urebad.de> writes:
>> >> > > my laptop has muted sound after resuming the soundcard (by
>> >> > > s2ram/hibernation). The problem seems to be that the cached register
>> >> > > values are not written back to the device properly.
>> >>
>> >> I've got the same exact issue on a Thinkpad T30:
>> >>
>> >> 0 [I82801CAICH3 ]: ICH - Intel 82801CA-ICH3
>> >> Intel 82801CA-ICH3 with AD1881A at irq 5
>> >>
>> >> 00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corporation 82801CA/CAM AC'97 Audio Controller (rev 02)
>> >
>> > Does this happen for both hibernation and S2RAM?
>> > And, resetting the mixer repairs the mute state, right?
>> > If yes, the problem appears independently from the codec chip. Hmm...
>>
>> Yes, happens in both cases here.
>>
>> The alsamixer shows the state of the channels before the suspension(!).
>
> Yes. The driver returns the cached values.
Okay.
>> If I change the channel state, the sound works again. No complete reset
>> needed at all, I just have to increase/decrease the value a bit (for
>> each affected channel).
>
> Just touching one mixer element?
What means `element' here? I have to touch MASTER and PCM in order to
get some output again, at least ;)
>> >From my experiments with the code, I figured that the cached register
>> values are not written back properly on resume. The cache is in the
>> correct state but the hardware is not. This also explains the behaviour
>> when changing the channels with alsamixer; the register cache is touched
>> and written back (and this time, the value really gets through to the
>> hardware).
>
> Right.
>
> snd_ac97_resume() has a check whether the write to MASTER register
> succeeds, but its timeout is 100ms. Could you check whether this
> check passes at resume or failed? I remember that some device
> actually passed the test but didn't update the real hardware state.
> If it failed on yours, we may simply extend the timeout, or make it
> pending somehow. If the hardware fools us, however, it'd be toucher.
By experimentation I found that the writeback works with a two seconds
delay before writeback. I can't remember if it was before or after the
check. Another approach was to hammer down the value by writing and
reading back in a loop until the hardware responded with the correct
value.
I will redo the tests later and report back to you what helped.
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists