[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <486A5378.7020601@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 08:55:36 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: [RFT] x86 acpi: normalize segment descriptor register on resume
Andi Kleen wrote:
>> It still seems incredibly risky to push this for 2.6.26, especially
>> given the Elan revelation.
>
> Do Elans even support S3?
I don't know if they do, but I don't know offhand the extent of machines
that may have that problem, especially since Intel now document it as
"failures are readily seen".
>> I think it needs to be tested on the 2.6.27
>> track, and then possibly be pushed back via the 2.6.26-stable route.
>
> I'm just not sure how many suspend/resume cycles people really do
> on a early (pre -rc) mainline kernel (or in linux-next for that
> matter). You usually have to install on a laptop and actually
> use it.
>
> Since this code is only executed on resume some directed testing
> would be better. That is what Rafael asked for in this mail.
The issue is mostly if it breaks some obscure system. I have put it on
my laptop, Ingo has it on this test system with a suspend-testing cycle,
and so on, but the number of systems exposed is going to be small.
> I think it would be ok for .26 if we can get confirmation it works
> on a few systems with S3 suspend/resume.
That we already know it does, but it took a long time even until the
regression came to light.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists