[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1prpxh2fl.fsf@frodo.ebiederm.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 11:41:50 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [crash, bisected] Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86_64: Fold pda into per cpu area
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> writes:
> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>>
>>> The zero-based PDA mechanism requires the introduction of a new ELF segment
>>> based at vaddr 0 which is sufficiently unusual that it wouldn't surprise me
> if
>>> its triggering some toolchain bug.
>>
>> Agreed. Given the previous description my hunch is that the bug is occurring
>> during objcopy. If vmlinux is good and the compressed kernel is bad.
>>
>
> Actually, it's not all that unusual... it's pretty common in various restricted
> environments. That being said, it's probably uncommon for *64-bit* code.
It is a sensible thing to expect to work. By unusual I mean it isn't triggered
by normal userspace code. In general I find that ld features if they aren't used
in userspace and they aren't used in the kernel don't work reliably across versions.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists