linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/7] fat/dir.c: switch to struct __fat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d3ce91fd3e848699cff311608.ps@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Date:	Tue, 01 Jul 2008 11:57:03 +0900
From:	OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
To:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp,
	bunk@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] fat/dir.c: switch to struct __fat_dirent


struct __fat_dirent is what was formerly the kernel struct dirent
(that was different from the userspace struct dirent).

Converting all fat users to struct __fat_dirent will allow us to get 
rid of the conflicting struct dirent definition.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
---

 fs/fat/dir.c |    7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff -puN fs/fat/dir.c~fat_use-fat_fs_dirent fs/fat/dir.c
--- linux-2.6/fs/fat/dir.c~fat_use-fat_fs_dirent	2008-07-01 09:50:49.000000000 +0900
+++ linux-2.6-hirofumi/fs/fat/dir.c	2008-07-01 11:34:35.000000000 +0900
@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/time.h>
 #include <linux/msdos_fs.h>
-#include <linux/dirent.h>
 #include <linux/smp_lock.h>
 #include <linux/buffer_head.h>
 #include <linux/compat.h>
@@ -715,7 +714,7 @@ efault:									   \
 	return -EFAULT;							   \
 }
 
-FAT_IOCTL_FILLDIR_FUNC(fat_ioctl_filldir, dirent)
+FAT_IOCTL_FILLDIR_FUNC(fat_ioctl_filldir, __fat_dirent)
 
 static int fat_ioctl_readdir(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp,
 			     void __user *dirent, filldir_t filldir,
@@ -741,7 +740,7 @@ static int fat_ioctl_readdir(struct inod
 static int fat_dir_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp,
 			 unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
 {
-	struct dirent __user *d1 = (struct dirent __user *)arg;
+	struct __fat_dirent __user *d1 = (struct __fat_dirent __user *)arg;
 	int short_only, both;
 
 	switch (cmd) {
@@ -757,7 +756,7 @@ static int fat_dir_ioctl(struct inode *i
 		return fat_generic_ioctl(inode, filp, cmd, arg);
 	}
 
-	if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, d1, sizeof(struct dirent[2])))
+	if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, d1, sizeof(struct __fat_dirent[2])))
 		return -EFAULT;
 	/*
 	 * Yes, we don't need this put_user() absolutely. However old
_
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/