[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874p79tils.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 23:11:43 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [crash, bisected] Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86_64: Fold pda into per cpu area
ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes:
>
> Has anyone investigated using the technique gcc uses for thread local storage?
I investigated a long time ago (given when the binutils/gcc support
was much more primitive) and my conclusion back then was that doing
the same for kernel module (negative addresses) would need
new relocation types. And the pain of a binutils change didn't
seem worth it.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists