linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] security: filesystem capabilities bugfix1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080701150406.2435593a.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 1 Jul 2008 15:04:06 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Andrew G. Morgan" <morgan@...nel.org>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, serue@...ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] security: filesystem capabilities bugfix1

I'll assume that patches 1 and 2 are needed in 2.6.26 and that
patches 3 and 4 are for 2.6.27.

Patches 1 and/or 2 caused a reject in
security-protect-legacy-applications-from-executing-with-insufficient-privilege.patch:

***************
*** 350,357 ****
  				bprm->e_gid = current->gid;
  			}
  			if (!capable (CAP_SETPCAP)) {
- 				new_permitted = cap_intersect (new_permitted,
- 							current->cap_permitted);
  			}
  		}
  	}
--- 364,372 ----
  				bprm->e_gid = current->gid;
  			}
  			if (!capable (CAP_SETPCAP)) {
+ 				bprm->cap_post_exec_permitted = cap_intersect(
+ 					bprm->cap_post_exec_permitted,
+ 					current->cap_permitted);
  			}
  		}
  	}

which looked simple to fix.  I'll resend the resulting diff - please
check.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/