[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080701151650.f27a425a.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 15:16:50 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: <Solofo.Ramangalahy@...l.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, matthltc@...ibm.com, cmm@...ibm.com,
Nadia.Derbey@...l.net, manfred@...orfullife.com,
nickpiggin@...oo.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 0/3] sysv ipc: increase msgmnb with the number of
cpus
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 11:34:52 +0200
<Solofo.Ramangalahy@...l.net> wrote:
> The size in bytes of a SysV IPC message queue, msgmnb, is too small
> for large machines, but we don't want to bloat small machines.
>
> This series change ("scale") the default value of
> /proc/sys/kernel/msgmnb.
I'm afraid I've lost track of what's happening here. Did we come up
with an alternative to "magical positive-versus-negative number trick"?
Your patch #1 adds and uses recompute_msgmnb() without adding the
declaration to a header file. Your patch #2 does add the
recompute_msgmnb() to a header file, so we have a window in which the
build is broken, which is bad.
recompute_msgmnb() isn't a terribly good globally-visible identifier,
btw. It is nice to add some subsystem identifer as a prefix. There's
little chance of this symbol colliding with anything else, so this is a
minor cosmetic thing in this case.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists