[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080702002421.084d4f1c@kopernikus.site>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 00:24:21 +0200
From: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add base_hi BAR for oxsemi_840
* Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> [2008-07-01 15:00]:
> >
> > --- a/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c
> > @@ -2877,7 +2877,7 @@ static struct parport_pc_pci {
> > * and 840 locks up if you write 1 to bit 2! */
> > /* oxsemi_952 */ { 1, { { 0, 1 }, } },
> > /* oxsemi_954 */ { 1, { { 0, -1 }, } },
> > - /* oxsemi_840 */ { 1, { { 0, -1 }, } },
> > + /* oxsemi_840 */ { 1, { { 0, 1 }, } },
> > /* aks_0100 */ { 1, { { 0, -1 }, } },
> > /* mobility_pp */ { 1, { { 0, 1 }, } },
> > /* netmos_9705 */ { 1, { { 0, -1 }, } }, /* untested */
>
> My parport knowledge doesn't permit me to understand how serious the
> just-fixed bug was. Non-functional parport?
>
> If so, this looks like a 2.6.26 and 2.6.25.x fix?
No, for good old printers, everything works. It's just that ECR
register was not available (the base_hi stuff). Because of that,
the TRISTATE detection did not work, which meant that for me my
self-built logic analyzer which uses the parallel port did not work.
Just merge in 2.6.27 is enough. :)
Bernhard
--
Bernhard Walle, SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Architecture Development
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists