[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080702110437.GB6761@frolo.macqel>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 13:04:37 +0200
From: Philippe De Muyter <phdm@...qel.be>
To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
libdc1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com,
linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: mmap'ed memory in core files ?
[CC+= linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net]
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 12:58:05PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> [CC+= hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com]
>
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Philippe De Muyter <phdm@...qel.be> wrote:
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 08:16:11PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> >> On 7/1/08, Philippe De Muyter <phdm@...qel.be> wrote:
> >> > Hello everybody,
> >> >
> >> > I develop video acquisition software using the video1394 interface.
> >> > The images grabbed by the camera and iee1394 bus are kept in kernel
> >> > memory and made available to the user program through a mmap call done
> >> > in the libdc1394 library :
> >> >
> >> > dma_ring_buffer= mmap(0, vmmap.nb_buffers * vmmap.buf_size,
> >> > PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_SHARED, craw->capture.dma_fd, 0);
> >> >
> >> > Sometimes, my program crashes and produces a core file :) It seems to
> >> > me that the core file does not contain the mmap'ed memory and hence
> >> > I cannot replay my program with the same image for debugging purpose.
> >> >
> >> > Is it possible to configure the kernel through /proc, or through the mmap
> >> > system call to have that mmapped segment in the core file, or do I need
> >> > to modify the kernel itself to obtain the behaviour I want ? If I
> >> > need to modify the kernel, can some kind soul provide me some pointers ?
> >>
> >>
> >> Have a look at the section "Controlling which mappings are written to
> >> the core dump" in a recent core.5 man page:
> >> http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man5/core.5.html
> >
> > thanks for the info. I didn't know about /proc/PID/coredump_filter.
> >
> > that part was promising :
> >
> > bit 2 Dump file-backed private mappings.
> > bit 3 Dump file-backed shared mappings.
> >
> > The default value of coredump_filter is 0x3; this reflects traditional
> > Linux behavior and means that only anonymous memory segments are dumped.
> >
> > Unfortunately, the part that applies to me (I have tested it) is the next one :
> >
> > Memory-mapped I/O pages such as frame buffer are never dumped, [...],
> > regardless of the coredump_filter value.
> >
> > Is that a design decision, or a mere finding of the way it is implemented
> > now ?
> >
> > So, back to my original question :
> >
> > Can some kind soul provide me some pointers to the way I should modify
> > the kernel to make the inclusion of the video1394 mmapped segment in
> > core files possible ?
>
> Perhaps Hidehiro, who wrote the coredump_filter feature, can provide insight.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
>
> --
> Michael Kerrisk
> Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
> man-pages online: http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online_pages.html
> Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html
--
Philippe De Muyter phdm at macqel dot be Tel +32 27029044
Macq Electronique SA rue de l'Aeronef 2 B-1140 Bruxelles Fax +32 27029077
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists