lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080702131652.GA12138@frolo.macqel>
Date:	Wed, 2 Jul 2008 15:16:52 +0200
From:	Philippe De Muyter <phdm@...qel.be>
To:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc:	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	libdc1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com,
	linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: mmap'ed memory in core files ?

On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 02:24:59PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Philippe De Muyter <phdm@...qel.be> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi Michael,
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 08:16:11PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
>>>>> Have a look at the section "Controlling which mappings are written to
>>>>> the core dump" in a recent core.5 man page:
>>>>> http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man5/core.5.html
>>>> thanks for the info.  I didn't know about /proc/PID/coredump_filter.
>>>>
>>>> that part was promising :
>>>>
>>>>       bit 2  Dump file-backed private mappings.
>>>>       bit 3  Dump file-backed shared mappings.
>>>>
>>>>    The default value of coredump_filter is 0x3; this reflects 
>>>> traditional
>>>>    Linux behavior and means that only anonymous memory segments are 
>>>> dumped.
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately, the part that applies to me (I have tested it) is the 
>>>> next one :
>>>>
>>>>    Memory-mapped I/O pages such as frame buffer are never dumped, [...],
>>>>    regardless of the coredump_filter value.
>
> This shouldn't be a problem to you as far as I understand.  I suppose 
> "memory mapped I/O pages" means registers of PCI devices, mapped into the 
> memory address space.
>
> The DMA buffer which you would like to get included in the core file is 
> normal RAM (I suppose: allocated by the kernel in the kernel's virtual 
> address space, mapped into the application client's address space by 
> mmap(), and also mapped into the FireWire controller's local bus address 
> space for it to write received data into).

I agree with your analysis, but the sentence takes as exemple 'frame buffer'
which I don't think are registers. I have tested with a video1394 client,
and I do not get the mmapped video memory in the core file, even with
/proc/PID/coredump_filter set to 0xf.  So, while I agree it seems technically
feasible, it does not seem to be currently implemented :(

Philippe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ