[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080702094010.10232256@extreme>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 09:40:10 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Benoit Boissinot <bboissin@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lloyd@...dombit.net,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bug in random32.c: all-zero outputs with probability 1/2^32,
other seeding bugs
On Tue, 01 Jul 2008 22:22:31 -0500
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 17:34 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 01:19:27 +0200
> > Benoit Boissinot <bboissin@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > > [who maintains random32.c ?]
> >
> > ah. I think it's ancient net code which was recently hoisted into lib/.
> > So: not really anybody.
> >
> > I've been hopefully cc'ing Matt and Ted in the hope of fooling them
> > into looking at it. But a netdev cc is appropriate also.
>
> I did look at it, and it looks reasonable. So:
>
> Acked-by: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
>
> Stephen Hemminger is responsible for the original code, I believe. I've
> been tempted to slurp this functionality into random.c but keep getting
> side-tracked into theoretical investigations of better functions, as I'm
> not a big fan of the current one from either a performance or strength
> perspective.
>
Yes, I took it from gnu scientific lib it for use in netem. The seeding
fixes make sense.
Note: this should not be a security issue since this routine is explicitly
not intended for cryptographic use.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists