[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080702094711.6a93ff77.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 09:47:11 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
greg@...ah.com
Subject: Re: Is sysfs the right place to get cache and CPU topology info?
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 21:46:47 +1000 Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org> wrote:
> > If they're talking about using the existing ones then sure, those are
> > cast in stone as far as I'm concerned.
> >
> > But they do need to be a _bit_ defensive. If they see a file which has
> > multiple name:value fields (shouldn't happen) then don't fail if new
> > tuples turn up later on. Don't expect them to always be in the same
> > order. Don't fail if new files later turn up in a sysfs directory. If
> > a file has (a stupid) format like /proc/self/stat then be prepared for
> > new columns to appear later on, etc.
> >
> > But if basic and obvious steps like that are taken in the library, and
> > later kernel changes cause that library to break, we get to fix the
> > kernel to unbreak their library.
>
> I assume they can rely on finding the stuff they need under
> /sys/devices/system/cpu. Or do they need to traverse the whole of
> /sys, and if so, how would they know which directories they should be
> looking in?
/sys/devices/system/cpu sounds good to me. Everyone's mounting it at
/sys.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists