lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 2 Jul 2008 20:42:50 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hch@...radead.org,
	Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] vfs: fix lookup on deleted directory

On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 09:30:15PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:

> Lookup can install a child dentry for a deleted directory.  This keeps
> the directory dentry alive, and the inode pinned in the cache and on
> disk, even after all external references have gone away.
> 
> This isn't a big problem normally, since memory pressure or umount
> will clear out the directory dentry and its children, releasing the
> inode.  But for UBIFS this causes problems because its orphan area can
> overflow.
> 
> Fix this by returning ENOENT for all lookups on a S_DEAD directory
> before creating a child dentry.

I wonder if it would be better to do that in a slightly different way:
if ->lookup() returns negative dentry, check if parent is dead and drop
the sucker if it is.  OTOH, "no ->lookup() will be ever called for
dead ones" seems to be a nice property and we are on sufficiently slow
path to not worry about the cost of check-and-branch-not-taken, so I'll
probably drop my variant and pick yours instead.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ