[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080702194249.GV28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 20:42:50 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hch@...radead.org,
Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] vfs: fix lookup on deleted directory
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 09:30:15PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Lookup can install a child dentry for a deleted directory. This keeps
> the directory dentry alive, and the inode pinned in the cache and on
> disk, even after all external references have gone away.
>
> This isn't a big problem normally, since memory pressure or umount
> will clear out the directory dentry and its children, releasing the
> inode. But for UBIFS this causes problems because its orphan area can
> overflow.
>
> Fix this by returning ENOENT for all lookups on a S_DEAD directory
> before creating a child dentry.
I wonder if it would be better to do that in a slightly different way:
if ->lookup() returns negative dentry, check if parent is dead and drop
the sucker if it is. OTOH, "no ->lookup() will be ever called for
dead ones" seems to be a nice property and we are on sufficiently slow
path to not worry about the cost of check-and-branch-not-taken, so I'll
probably drop my variant and pick yours instead.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists