[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1215030438.28676.20.camel@lappy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 22:27:18 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@...inux.co.jp>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix task dirty balancing
On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 17:26 +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> hi,
>
> task_dirty_inc doesn't seem to be called properly for
> filesystems which don't use set_page_dirty for write(2).
> eg. ext2 w/o nobh option.
I'm thinking this is an ext2 bug. So I'd rather it'd just call
set_page_dirty() like a proper filesystem instead of doing things like
this.
And I certainly don't like exporting task_dirty_inc() - filesystems and
the like should not have to know about things like that.
Of course I'm utterly ignorant of filesystems, hence lets include more
clue-full people.
> YAMAMOTO Takashi
>
>
> Signed-off-by: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@...inux.co.jp>
> ---
>
> commit e68f05bf56d0652c107bba1cff3f8491e41a2117
> Author: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@...inux.co.jp>
> Date: Wed Jul 2 16:17:33 2008 +0900
>
> fix dirty balancing for tasks.
>
> call task_dirty_inc when dirtying a page with mark_buffer_dirty.
>
> diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
> index 4788a9e..2f1c7c6 100644
> --- a/fs/buffer.c
> +++ b/fs/buffer.c
> @@ -1219,8 +1219,9 @@ void mark_buffer_dirty(struct buffer_head *bh)
> return;
> }
>
> - if (!test_set_buffer_dirty(bh))
> - __set_page_dirty(bh->b_page, page_mapping(bh->b_page), 0);
> + if (!test_set_buffer_dirty(bh) &&
> + __set_page_dirty(bh->b_page, page_mapping(bh->b_page), 0))
> + task_dirty_inc(current);
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/include/linux/writeback.h b/include/linux/writeback.h
> index bd91987..61d0aec 100644
> --- a/include/linux/writeback.h
> +++ b/include/linux/writeback.h
> @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ int wakeup_pdflush(long nr_pages);
> void laptop_io_completion(void);
> void laptop_sync_completion(void);
> void throttle_vm_writeout(gfp_t gfp_mask);
> +void task_dirty_inc(struct task_struct *);
>
> /* These are exported to sysctl. */
> extern int dirty_background_ratio;
> diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
> index 29b1d1e..4dc85d0 100644
> --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
> +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
> @@ -176,10 +176,11 @@ void bdi_writeout_inc(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bdi_writeout_inc);
>
> -static inline void task_dirty_inc(struct task_struct *tsk)
> +void task_dirty_inc(struct task_struct *tsk)
> {
> prop_inc_single(&vm_dirties, &tsk->dirties);
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(task_dirty_inc);
>
> /*
> * Obtain an accurate fraction of the BDI's portion.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists