linux-kernel - Re: next-0702: ACPI Error (nseval-0159): Insufficient arguments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:48:51 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@...il.com>
CC:	lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...l.org
Subject: Re: next-0702: ACPI Error (nseval-0159): Insufficient arguments

Alexander Beregalov wrote:
> Hi
> 
> I have several these messages.
> It is Dual-Core Opteron 1214.
> 
> CONFIG_ACPI=y
> CONFIG_ACPI_DOCK=y
> CONFIG_ACPI_BLACKLIST_YEAR=0
> CONFIG_ACPI_EC=y
> CONFIG_ACPI_POWER=y
> CONFIG_ACPI_SYSTEM=y
> CONFIG_PNPACPI=y
> 
> Let me know if you need more info.
> 
> [    0.888708] WARNING: at nseval:159 acpi_ut_error+0x32/0xa2()

Andrew, that's the bad side effect I talked about earlier. Now the
warning doesn't report the right place, but just the error function
and it's unclear who causes it due to the unreliable backtrace.

Alexander,

Is this something that you didn't see in older kernels? If yes when did 
it start?

Can you please file a full report in http://bugzilla.kernel.org?

Thanks,
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/