linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Support for the at91sam9g20 : Atmel 400Mhz ARM 926ej-s SOC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <486CDFE5.9030105@atmel.com>
Date:	Thu, 03 Jul 2008 16:19:17 +0200
From:	Sedji Gaouaou <sedji.gaouaou@...el.com>
To:	unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
CC:	Andrew Victor <avictor.za@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk,
	VILCHEZ Patrice <Patrice.VILCHEZ@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Support for the at91sam9g20 : Atmel 400Mhz ARM 926ej-s
 SOC

Hi Andrew,
>   
>> +/*
>> + * MCI (SD/MMC)
>> + */
>> +static struct at91_mmc_data __initdata ek_mmc_data = {
>> +	.slot_b		= 1,
>> +	.wire4		= 1,
>> +//	.det_pin	= ... not connected
>> +//	.wp_pin		= ... not connected
>> +//	.vcc_pin	= ... not connected
>>     
>
> Please make these a proper comment, preferably inside the comment before
> the structure.  C++ comments are frowned upon in the kernel's source.
>
>   
I would like to know what do you suggest about this comment? Indeed we 
already use this kind of comments, for instance in board-sam9260ek.c. I 
don't mind changing it into the proper comment form, but I would like to 
know first what do you suggest.

Regards,
Sedji

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/