[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080703151209.GA17059@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 17:12:09 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, peterz@...radead.org, npiggin@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] sched: newidle and RT wake-buddy fixes
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com> wrote:
>
> > I may have found the issue: It looks like the hunk that initially
> > disables interrupts in load_balance_newidle() was inadvertently
> > applied to load_balance() instead during the merge to linux-tip. If
> > you fold the following patch into my original patch, it should set
> > things right again.
>
> ah, sorry - indeed! I've reactivated your patch and i'm testing it
> now.
-tip testing found that it still hangs at:
Intel machine check architecture supported.
Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#1.
x86 PAT enabled: cpu 1, old 0x7040600070406, new 0x7010600070106
CPU1: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 3800+ stepping 02
Brought up 2 CPUs
Total of 2 processors activated (8044.97 BogoMIPS).
[...]
with this config:
http://redhat.com/~mingo/misc/config-Thu_Jul__3_16_49_53_CEST_2008.bad
on 3 separate test-systems.
I've again reverted both your fixup and the original commit. I've pushed
out the failing tree to the tmp.sched/devel.fe6149f5e82 -tip branch, you
should be able to reproduce it.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists