lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <486D4A92.2060004@infradead.org>
Date:	Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:54:26 +0100
From:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	mchan@...adcom.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin"

Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, 3 of July 2008, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> Still, maybe we can add some kbuild magic to build the blobs along with
>>> their modules and to install them under /lib/firmware (by default) when the
>>> modules are installed in /lib/modules/... ?
>> Something like appending this to Makefile?
>>
>> firmware_and_modules_install: firmware_install modules_install
>>
>> (I'm still wondering if we should make 'firmware_install' install to 
>> /lib/firmware by default, instead of into the build tree as 
>> 'headers_install' does. The Aunt Tillie answer would definitely be 
>> 'yes', although that means it requires root privs; like modules_install 
>> does.)
> 
> I would prefer 'make firmware_install' to just copy the blobs into specific
> location in analogy with 'make modules_install', so that you can build the
> blobs as a normal user (for example, on an NFS server) and then put them
> into the right place as root (for example, on an NFS client that has no write
> privilege on the server).

Not entirely sure which you mean. You _can't_ run 'make modules_install' 
as a normal user, unless you override $(INSTALL_MOD_PATH) on the command 
line.

Do you want 'make firmware_install' to be the same? It isn't at the 
moment -- it installs to a subdirectory of the kernel build tree, like 
'make headers_install' does. But I'm not sure which is better.

-- 
dwmw2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ