[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080703232554.7271d645@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 23:25:54 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
mchan@...adcom.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin"
O
> Further, all current kernel build and test etc. scripts are unaware of
> 'make firmware_install', and it is unfair to everybody to force a
> flag-day build process change on people, just to keep their drivers in
> the same working state today as it was yesterday.
IMHO we want firmware built in as the default for the moment. If the
firmware model makes sense (as I think it does) then the distributions
will catch up, turn it on and sort out the default behaviour - exactly as
they did all those years ago with modules, more recently with "use an
initrd" and so on.
> as "making no sense". All these are real world examples where users
> FOLLOWING THEIR NORMAL, PROSCRIBED KERNEL PROCESSES will produce
I hope you mean "prescribed" ;)
> The only valid assumption here is to assume that the user is /unaware/
> of these new steps they must take in order to continue to have a working
> system.
To a large extent not the user but their distro - consider "make install"
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists