| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <84144f020807040038u7a713d5ana608a7c79ee00eea@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 10:38:23 +0300 From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi> To: "Yoichi Yuasa" <yoichi_yuasa@...peaks.co.jp> Cc: "Christoph Lameter" <cl@...ux-foundation.org>, "Matt Mackall" <mpm@...enic.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: slub: Do not use 192 byte sized cache if minimum alignment is 128 byte Hi Yoichi, On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: >>> The 192 byte cache is not necessary if we have a basic alignment of 128 >>> byte. If it would be used then the 192 would be aligned to the next 128 byte >>> boundary which would result in another 256 byte cache. Two 256 kmalloc caches >>> cause sysfs to complain about a duplicate entry. >>> >>> MIPS needs 128 byte aligned kmalloc caches and spits out warnings on boot without >>> this patch. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org> On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 18:37:52 +0300 "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi> wrote: >> Looks good to me. Yoichi, did you have the chance to test this? On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 3:28 AM, Yoichi Yuasa <yoichi_yuasa@...peaks.co.jp> wrote: > I've already done. > It has no problem. Thank you for testing! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists