[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080704090803.545d52be@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 09:08:03 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: michael@...erman.id.au
Cc: benh@...nel.crashing.org, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Martine.Silbermann@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Multiple MSI
> In most cases that I can see the conversion from irq number to irq_desc
> is done in the genirq code, so I don't see why you couldn't just put a
> remapping in there from irq numbers to descs that doesn't use an array.
> But maybe I'm missing something.
There are a pile of drivers you would also need to fix up that use NR_IRQ
sized tables. There is also the performance concern. The irq->desc
conversion has to be very fast.
It would be better (IMHO) if dev->irq and irq in general was a pointer
whose number for end users was irq->num or similar.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists