[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <486E9366.2090901@skyrush.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:17:26 -0600
From: Joe Peterson <joe@...rush.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: Elias Oltmanns <eo@...ensachen.de>,
Török Edwin <edwintorok@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Ctrl+C doesn't interrupt process waiting for I/O
Alan Cox wrote:
>> disk activity process over each time it completed), it always broke out
>> after one ^C - one time took an extra second or two. Note that I did
>> not run latencytop (did not have it compiled in my kernel) - if that is
>> required for the test, let me know, but I assume it is just for
>> gathering info when the issue occurs.
>
> I really don't think this is tty related looking at the code involved and
> also the lack of actual measurements presented. More likely scheduler and
> VM related changes.
Alan, many thanks for your assessment - it's greatly appreciated. Now
that I've looked into it, the only peculiar thing I see is the redundant
flush_buffer call. Do you think that should be removed anyway? It
seems that the following two calls do the same thing in n_tty.c:
n_tty_flush_buffer(tty);
tty_driver_flush_buffer(tty);
If this looks redundant, let me know, and I can submit a patch to just
call n_tty_flush_buffer(tty).
-Thanks, Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists