lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 4 Jul 2008 15:24:10 -0700
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@...eus.cx>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: How to alloc highmem page below 4GB on i386?

On Sat, 5 Jul 2008 00:02:59 +0200
Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@...eus.cx> wrote:

> On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 13:37:33 -0700
> Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 22:23:23 +0200
> > Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@...eus.cx> wrote:
> > > 
> > > I was under the impression that the PCI bus was utterly incapable
> > > of any larger address than 32 bits? But perhaps you only consider
> > > PCIE stuff high-perf. :)
> > 
> > actually your impression is not correct. There's a difference
> > between how many physical bits the bus has, and the logical data.
> > Specifically, PCI (and PCIE etc) have something that's called "Dual
> > Address Cycle", which is a pci bus transaction that sends the 64
> > bit address using 2 cycles on the bus even if the buswidth is 32
> > bit (logically).
> > 
> 
> Ah, I see. I have to admit to only have read the PCI spec briefly. :)
> 
> Still, the devices I'm poking have 32-bit fields, so the limitation is
> still there for my case.

yeah only a portion of the devices out there support the higher
addresses unfortunately. (This comes back to: "the assumption is that
high performance devices support 64 bit". It's an assumption but it
doesn't seem to be too far off the mark)

> 
> > > 
> > > The strange thing is that I keep getting pages from > 4GB all the
> > > time, even on a loaded system. I would have expected mostly
> > > getting pages below that limit as that's where most of the memory
> > > is. Do you have any insight into which areas tend to fill up
> > > first?
> > 
> > ok this is tricky and goes way deep into buddy allocator internals.
> > On the highest level (2Mb chunks iirc, but it could be a bit or
> > two bigger now) we allocate top down. But once we split such a top
> > level chunk up, inside the chunk we allocate bottom up (so that the
> > scatter gather IOs tend to group nicer). 
> > In addition, the kernel will prefer allocating userspace/pagecache
> > memory from highmem over lowmem, out of an effort to keep memory
> > pressure in the lowmem zones lower.
> > 
> 
> For the test I'm playing with, in does a second order allocation,
> which I suppose has good odds of finding a suitable hole somewhere in
> the upper GB.
> 
> Ah well, I suppose this highmem business will eventually blow over. ;)

hehe

well... a copy isn't free, but it's also not THAT expensive. In the
order of 3000 to 4000 cycles or so for a 4Kb copy (of course this varies
with hardware, but as a rough estimate it's in that ballpark)

Another thing is.. use the iommu ;)

-- 
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@...ux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists