[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0807032324150.26730@engineering.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 23:26:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Avoid bio_endio recursion
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008, Alan Cox wrote:
>
>> But not for SATA disks. The only thing SCSI and SATA disk have common is
>> that they may process concurrently more requests. There's nothing else.
>
> The only material difference between SATA and SCSI is the encoding of the
> command blocks and responses.
>
> Alan
That statement is true for any two block device protocol. Then, why
doesn't Linux use SCSI for all block devices? --- add scsi command block
to struct bio and we can pass them directly to controller driver :)
Mikulas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists