linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Avoid bio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 3 Jul 2008 23:26:34 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
cc:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Avoid bio_endio recursion

On Fri, 4 Jul 2008, Alan Cox wrote:

>
>> But not for SATA disks. The only thing SCSI and SATA disk have common is
>> that they may process concurrently more requests. There's nothing else.
>
> The only material difference between SATA and SCSI is the encoding of the
> command blocks and responses.
>
> Alan

That statement is true for any two block device protocol. Then, why 
doesn't Linux use SCSI for all block devices? --- add scsi command block 
to struct bio and we can pass them directly to controller driver :)

Mikulas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/