lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 3 Jul 2008 23:26:34 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Mikulas Patocka <>
To:	Alan Cox <>
cc:	Jens Axboe <>,,
	Neil Brown <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Avoid bio_endio recursion

On Fri, 4 Jul 2008, Alan Cox wrote:

>> But not for SATA disks. The only thing SCSI and SATA disk have common is
>> that they may process concurrently more requests. There's nothing else.
> The only material difference between SATA and SCSI is the encoding of the
> command blocks and responses.
> Alan

That statement is true for any two block device protocol. Then, why 
doesn't Linux use SCSI for all block devices? --- add scsi command block 
to struct bio and we can pass them directly to controller driver :)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists