[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0807051606570.28765@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 16:07:39 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: the printk problem
On Saturday 2008-07-05 15:50, Vegard Nossum wrote:
>
>I think the most elegant solution would be a macro similar to the
>initcall macros, that adds the custom extensions to a table which is
>defined by a special linker section. This allows complete
>decentralization, but I don't think it's possible to do binary search
>on the names anymore.
With an rbtree, you can still do binary search.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists