[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <31e679430807050844r30ff74fby7e15641573b42d82@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 18:44:21 +0300
From: "Felipe Balbi" <felipebalbi@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: "Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: "Kernel development list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Battery life difference
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> wrote:
> Which wireless is this? Same for graphics
intel iwl4965 and intel mobile bm965/GL960 (graphics)
> these don't give you all that much nowadays
hmm... interesting :-)
where should i look for more info ? Any pointers would be nice
> There's a few things you can do to help stuff along; make sure you're
> using AHCI.
not loaded. Thanks
> Also take a look at
> http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2008/5/8/1771024 because
> these patches save like 0.75W in our lab.
cool, is it merged upstream ?
I'll build current git kernel and reply again with new linux results.
It could be that ubuntu 2.6.24 is broken somehow...
> To be honest, I'm surprised at your results; in our testing (with a
> different distro though) we don't see such a difference and Linux is
> doing rather well.
can you get powertop results in a 2.6.24 distro kernel and current git
kernel ?
--
Best Regards,
Felipe Balbi
felipebalbi@...rs.sourceforge.net
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists