[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080705235148.GW28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 00:51:48 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] parport/ppdev: fix registration of sysctl entries
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 03:21:06PM +0200, Marcin Slusarz wrote:
> ppdev (which provides support for user-space parallel port device drivers)
> is slightly different from other parallel port drivers. It allows to open
> the device by more than one process, but locks the device on ioctl (PPCLAIM).
> Unfortunately registration of sysctl entries were done before locking
> the device, so 2 processes could open it and try to register sysctl
> (it ignored error on registration, so it didn't block access to port).
>
> So move registration of sysctl after locking (parport_claim_or_block).
I don't believe that it's right. Note that if you *do* race there, you
are fucked regardless of sysctls - ppdev.c::register_device() racing
with itself will do tons of fun things all by itself (starting with two
threads allocating different pdev and both setting pp->pdev).
IOW, *if* that's what we are hitting here, you've only papered over the
visible symptom.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists