[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <36ca99e90807050250u718fa277t2297d6436fd14c4e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 11:50:26 +0200
From: "Bert Wesarg" <bert.wesarg@...glemail.com>
To: "Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: masbock@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [9/9] MCE: Use 64bit machine check code on 32bit
Hi,
> Index: linux/arch/x86/Kconfig
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ linux/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -652,10 +652,37 @@ config X86_MCE
> to disable it. MCE support simply ignores non-MCE processors like
> the 386 and 486, so nearly everyone can say Y here.
>
> +config X86_OLD_MCE
> + depends on X86_32
> + bool "Use legacy machine check code (will go away)"
> + default n
> + help
> + Use the old i386 machine check code. This is merely intended for testing
> + in a transition period. Try this if you run into any machine check
> + related software problems.
> + When in doubt say no.
> +
> +config X86_ANCIENT_MCE
> + depends on X86_32
> + bool "Support ancient machine check handler for very old CPUs"
> + default n
> + help
> + Include support for family 5 (Intel Pentium 1 and Centaur Winchip)
> + machine check code. Machine check handles uncorrected CPU errors.
> + Note that the P5 pentium support is disabled
> + by default and can be only enabled on special hardware.
> + The Winchip code doesn't do much.
> + If you're still sure you want it, say n, otherwise n is safe
Is this first "n" a typo?
Bert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists