[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080705113434.41109492@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 11:34:34 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Joe Peterson <joe@...rush.com>, Elias Oltmanns <eo@...ensachen.de>,
Török Edwin <edwintorok@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Ctrl+C doesn't interrupt process waiting for I/O
> So what kind of data do you want? Someone watching a wallclock while
> comparing Ctrl-Z+kill versus Ctrl-C on a IO intensive process?
Latency traces with timestamps might be quite useful, they'd probably
also tell you why it happened. I can't reproduce it, nobody has provided
numbers so even if I wanted to work on it I couldn't do much.
Instead I have lots of real tty, ATA and other work that needs doing
which has quantified data, is reproducable and needs doing, so that will
get done.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists