linux-kernel - v2.6.26-rc9: ACPI PCI irq routing on NUMA? + early

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <19f34abd0807060647k54490088uf8859d8a1646fd41@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 6 Jul 2008 15:47:19 +0200
From:	"Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
To:	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Alexey Starikovskiy" <astarikovskiy@...e.de>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com, "Huang Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
	"Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: v2.6.26-rc9: ACPI PCI irq routing on NUMA? + early_ioremap trouble

Hi,

I have produced a config which doesn't boot correctly on either of my
computers with v2.6.26-rc9.

The first problem is with my laptop, which hangs on boot, see
screenshot (sorry for the bad quality, I was in a hurry):
http://folk.uio.no/vegardno/linux/DSCF3026.JPG

I figured there's something wrong with ACPI PCI irq routing as I'm
missing a message that shows up in my usual configs:

calling  ide_scan_pcibus+0x0/0xf0
ICH8M: IDE controller (0x8086:0x2850 rev 0x03) at  PCI slot 0000:00:1f.1
    --- HERE: ---
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:1f.1[A] -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18
    ----
ICH8M: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later

...and as can be seen in the screenshot, ide-cd "lost interrupt".
Unfortunately, I don't have a serial line on this machine, so it's
hard to get the full log. (Maybe I can try netconsole, it seems to be
up by the time this happens.)

(I also tried booting with acpi=off, acpi=noirq, pci=noacpi, to no avail.)

Note that this does not seem to be a regression; I get the same thing
with -rc8 as well. I'm guessing it's config-induced, here are my
config changes that triggered it:
http://folk.uio.no/vegardno/linux/config-diff

I'll make a guess for the NUMA/ACPI stuff. And this is the full
config: http://folk.uio.no/vegardno/linux/config-bisect

I decided to also try this kernel with my desktop machine. This one
boots (probably because ACPI is disabled?), but I get the following
warning:

[    0.000000] Begin SRAT table scan....
[    0.000000] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[    0.000000] WARNING: at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:553 early_ioremap+0x1c1/0x200()
[    0.000000] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.26-rc9 #201
[    0.000000]  [<c0157d6f>] warn_on_slowpath+0x4f/0x70
[    0.000000]  [<c01708db>] ? up+0x2b/0x40
[    0.000000]  [<c01586f1>] ? release_console_sem+0x1c1/0x1f0
[    0.000000]  [<c05c0132>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x32/0x70
[    0.000000]  [<c05c0143>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x43/0x70
[    0.000000]  [<c0158705>] ? release_console_sem+0x1d5/0x1f0
[    0.000000]  [<c0158aff>] ? vprintk+0x1cf/0x430
[    0.000000]  [<c0158b0b>] ? vprintk+0x1db/0x430
[    0.000000]  [<c07c0b24>] ? __early_set_fixmap+0xb4/0xd0
[    0.000000]  [<c07c1231>] early_ioremap+0x1c1/0x200
[    0.000000]  [<c07bd48e>] get_memcfg_from_srat+0x15e/0x6d0
[    0.000000]  [<c01314be>] ? post_set+0x4e/0x50
[    0.000000]  [<c01315fa>] ? generic_get_mtrr+0x2a/0x100
[    0.000000]  [<c07c154d>] setup_memory+0xd/0x280
[    0.000000]  [<c07b3c7e>] setup_arch+0x2ee/0x4e0
[    0.000000]  [<c0158d7b>] ? printk+0x1b/0x20
[    0.000000]  [<c07ab842>] start_kernel+0x82/0x390
[    0.000000]  [<c07ab028>] i386_start_kernel+0x8/0x10
[    0.000000]  =======================
[    0.000000] ---[ end trace 4eaa2a86a8e2da22 ]---
[    0.000000] failed to get NUMA memory information from SRAT table
[    0.000000] NUMA - single node, flat memory mode

What really puzzles me is the line number of the WARN -- it says
arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:553. But this line does not contain any WARNs.
In fact, it's not even the right function. But this is a clean
v2.6.26-rc9 compile, as can be seen from the kernel version above.

There's also one a bit later:

[    7.746346] please boot with early_ioremap_debug and report the dmesg.
[    7.746460] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[    7.746569] WARNING: at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:524
check_early_ioremap_leak+0x3f/0x50()

See full dmesg at: http://folk.uio.no/vegardno/linux/dmesg-2.6.26-rc9
With early_ioremap_debug enabled:
http://folk.uio.no/vegardno/linux/dmesg-early_ioremap_debug

My apologies if I got the recipients wrong; I picked them off the
git-log for relevant files. Please Cc in the right direction if needed
:-)

Thanks!


Vegard

-- 
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
	-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/