[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200807062002.46863.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 20:02:45 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...il.com>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Maximilian Engelhardt <maxi@...monizer.de>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.26-rc9: Reported regressions from 2.6.25
On Sunday, 6 of July 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 07:05:49PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > Also, in the next couple of days I'll be closing the bugs the reporters of
> > which have been totally unresponsive.
> >...
>
> If no action by us gets combined with automated weekly emails then
> no responses to the latter is not an unexpected event.
>
> Such a submitter might be perfectly responsive to actual work on a bug
> while really pissed off by getting the bug closed.
>
> Look e.g. at #10865 that had a 1 month gap in submitter responses,
> but the actual problem is that noone of us ever bothered to look at
> this Oops...
>
> I just did a run through all open 2.6.26-rc regressions, and I did not
> find a single one where we seem to be waiting for some time for an
> answer of the submitter. [1]
The following are my candidates:
10629
10786
10815
10906 (the thread has apparently died)
11009
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists