linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] move __attribute__((__cold__)) functions back into final .text section

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080706211234.GA7425@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date:	Sun, 6 Jul 2008 23:12:34 +0200
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>, stable@...nel.org,
	llipavsky@...e.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] move __attribute__((__cold__)) functions back into final .text section

On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 11:17:17PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:36:01 +0100 "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@...ell.com> wrote:
> 
> > Due to the addition of __attribute__((__cold__)) to a few symbols
> > without adjusting the linker scripts, those symbols currently may end
> > up outside the [_stext,_etext) range, as they get placed in
> > .text.unlikely by (at least) gcc 4.3.0. This may confuse code not only
> > outside of the kernel, symbol_put_addr()'s BUG() could also trigger.
> > Hence we need to add .text.unlikely (and for future uses of
> > __attribute__((__hot__)) also .text.hot) to the TEXT_TEXT() macro.
> > 
> > Issue observed by Lukas Lipavsky.
> > 
> > Cc: Lukas Lipavsky <llipavsky@...e.cz>
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>
> > 
> > ---
> >  include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h |    4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > --- linux-2.6.26-rc6/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h	2008-04-17 04:49:44.000000000 +0200
> > +++ 2.6.26-rc6-hot-cold-text/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h	2008-06-18 12:19:22.000000000 +0200
> > @@ -204,6 +204,7 @@
> >   * during second ld run in second ld pass when generating System.map */
> >  #define TEXT_TEXT							\
> >  		ALIGN_FUNCTION();					\
> > +		*(.text.hot)						\
> >  		*(.text)						\
> >  		*(.ref.text)						\
> >  		*(.text.init.refok)					\
> > @@ -213,7 +214,8 @@
> >  	CPU_KEEP(init.text)						\
> >  	CPU_KEEP(exit.text)						\
> >  	MEM_KEEP(init.text)						\
> > -	MEM_KEEP(exit.text)
> > +	MEM_KEEP(exit.text)						\
> > +		*(.text.unlikely)
> >  
> >  
> >  /* sched.text is aling to function alignment to secure we have same
> > 
> 
> So this is now in Sam's
> git+ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sam/kbuild-next.git.
> But it is not in the present linux-next.  Either because Sam added it
> after Stephen pulled Sam's tree, or because something screwed up.
> 
> So I'll now be dropping it.  Sam, please ensure that it gets into
> 2.6.26 and 2.6.25.x (IMO).

I have added a Cc: <stable@...nel.org> so the stable team should pick
it when applied to -linus.

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/