[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48709348.6000101@grandegger.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2008 11:41:28 +0200
From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Luotao Fu <l.fu@...gutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc8-rt1: Strange latencies on mpc5200 powerpc - RCU issue?
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>> I removed all "likely" and "unlikely" macros, but the latencies did not
>> improve. Then I added
>>
>> preempt_disable();
>> preempt_enable();
>>
>> at the two locations mentioned above, like trace_mark() does, and
>> disabled CONFIG_RCU_TRACE. That helped to keep the latencies low, and it
>> did for 2.6.25.8-rt7 as well. As I see it, adding preemption points seem
>> to prevent high latencies.
>
> This to me sounds like we have preempt_enable_noresched someplace that
> shouldn't. In otherwords, we enabled preemption without checking if
> preemption is needed, which is a serious bug in -rt.
Yep, in 2.6.25.8-rt7 trace_mark() is not used any more, maybe for that
reason. Nevertheless, this "bug" kept the latency on my MPC5200 box low.
I will try with the old tracer to understand what the real cause of the
high latencies is (with CONFIG_RCU_TRACE disabled).
Wolfgang.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists