[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:21:34 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: nickpiggin@...oo.com.au
CC: miklos@...redi.hu, jamie@...reable.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hugh@...itas.com
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] mm: dont clear PG_uptodate in invalidate_complete_page2()
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Nick Piggin wrote:
> I don't know what became of this thread, but I agree with everyone else
> you should not skip clearing PG_uptodate here. If nothing else, it
> weakens some important assertions in the VM. But I agree that splice
> should really try harder to work with it and we should be a little
> careful about just changing things like this.
Sure, that's why I rfc'ed.
But I'd still like to know, what *are* those assumptions in the VM
that would be weakened by this?
Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists