linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] integrity: TPM cleanup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Xine.LNX.4.64.0807081122390.10307@us.intercode.com.au>
Date:	Tue, 8 Jul 2008 11:33:04 +1000 (EST)
From:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	safford@...son.ibm.com, serue@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	sailer@...son.ibm.com, zohar@...ibm.com, debora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	srajiv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] integrity: TPM cleanup

On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Mimi Zohar wrote:

> This patchset contains 5 patches.
> 	Patch 1/5 integrity: TPM cleanup (scripts/Lindent and other)
> 	Patch 2/5 integrity: TPM internal kernel interface
> 	Patch 3/5 integrity: special fs magic

I've previously reviewed and added "Reviewed-by:" lines for the above.

If the patches have not changed significantly, would you please ensure 
that the Reviewed-by/Acked-by/Signed-off lines are captured with them for 
subsequent postings ?

If the patches have changed and you've dropped these lines, please note 
what has changed.

It's also a good idea to cc people who have reviewed previous versions or 
postings of the patches when you repost them.

- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/