[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <48732751.BA47.005A.0@novell.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 06:37:37 -0600
From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@...ell.com>
To: "Nick Piggin" <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Cc: <mingo@...e.hu>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<npiggin@...e.de>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched: terminate newidle balancing once at
least one task has moved over
>>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 1:00 AM, in message
<200807081500.18245.nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>, Nick Piggin
<nickpiggin@...oo.com.au> wrote:
> On Saturday 28 June 2008 06:29, Gregory Haskins wrote:
>> Inspired by Peter Zijlstra.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
>
> What happened to the feedback I sent about this?
>
> It is still nack from me.
Ah yes. Slipped through the cracks...sorry about that.
What if we did "if (idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE && need_resched())" instead?
-Greg
>
>
>> ---
>>
>> kernel/sched.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
>> index 56722b1..0b9f90e 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
>> @@ -2863,6 +2863,10 @@ static int move_tasks(struct rq *this_rq, int
>> this_cpu, struct rq *busiest, max_load_move - total_load_moved,
>> sd, idle, all_pinned, &this_best_prio);
>> class = class->next;
>> +
>> + if (idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE && this_rq->nr_running)
>> + break;
>> +
>> } while (class && max_load_move > total_load_moved);
>>
>> return total_load_moved > 0;
>>
>> --
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists