[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200807082311.35793.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 23:11:35 +1000
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: "Akinobu Mita" <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Jason Baron" <jbaron@...hat.com>,
"Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
"Max Krasnyansky" <maxk@...lcomm.com>,
"Hidetoshi Seto" <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] stop_machine: simplify
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 21:44:40 Akinobu Mita wrote:
> I found a small possible cleanup in this patch.
Well spotted! I think this cleanup is actually orthogonal to my patch,
so best served as a separate patch, how's this?
===
Hotplug CPU: don't check cpu_online after take_cpu_down
Akinobu points out that if take_cpu_down() succeeds, the cpu must be offline
(otherwise we're in deep trouble anyway.
Remove the cpu_online() check, and put a BUG_ON().
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: "Akinobu Mita" <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
diff -r 805a2e5e68dd kernel/cpu.c
--- a/kernel/cpu.c Tue Jul 08 23:04:48 2008 +1000
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c Tue Jul 08 23:07:43 2008 +1000
@@ -226,8 +226,7 @@ static int __ref _cpu_down(unsigned int
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &tmp);
err = __stop_machine_run(take_cpu_down, &tcd_param, cpu);
-
- if (err || cpu_online(cpu)) {
+ if (err) {
/* CPU didn't die: tell everyone. Can't complain. */
if (raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_DOWN_FAILED | mod,
hcpu) == NOTIFY_BAD)
@@ -235,6 +234,7 @@ static int __ref _cpu_down(unsigned int
goto out_allowed;
}
+ BUG_ON(cpu_online(cpu));
/* Wait for it to sleep (leaving idle task). */
while (!idle_cpu(cpu))
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists